<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The PR-ad-marketing quibble</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newsvetter.com/2009/09/08/the-pr-ad-marketing-quibble/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newsvetter.com/2009/09/08/the-pr-ad-marketing-quibble/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 20:15:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason Falls</title>
		<link>http://www.newsvetter.com/2009/09/08/the-pr-ad-marketing-quibble/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Falls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 23:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsvetter.com/?p=1422#comment-136</guid>
		<description>Great post. I think in the 1960s Draper would have a point, but that was just the beginning of the maturation of the PR industry. Today, there are not only a ton of PR firms who execute, but the line between ad agencies and PR firms is often very blurred.

And social media practitioners aren&#039;t going to distinguish themselves much more convincingly. You&#039;re right - the clients and/or non-industry folks don&#039;t care who owns it ... from an agency/firm and external perspective. But they will be forced to care about who owns it internally because, hopefully, they&#039;ll embrace it there, too.

Great post and food for thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. I think in the 1960s Draper would have a point, but that was just the beginning of the maturation of the PR industry. Today, there are not only a ton of PR firms who execute, but the line between ad agencies and PR firms is often very blurred.</p>
<p>And social media practitioners aren&#8217;t going to distinguish themselves much more convincingly. You&#8217;re right &#8211; the clients and/or non-industry folks don&#8217;t care who owns it &#8230; from an agency/firm and external perspective. But they will be forced to care about who owns it internally because, hopefully, they&#8217;ll embrace it there, too.</p>
<p>Great post and food for thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

