<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How laziness killed my PR pitching platform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newsvetter.com/2010/07/13/how-laziness-killed-my-pr-pitching-platform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newsvetter.com/2010/07/13/how-laziness-killed-my-pr-pitching-platform/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 20:15:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Publicity pitch platforms have mixed value &#171; Media Mahout</title>
		<link>http://www.newsvetter.com/2010/07/13/how-laziness-killed-my-pr-pitching-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-568</link>
		<dc:creator>Publicity pitch platforms have mixed value &#171; Media Mahout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 01:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsvetter.com/?p=3022#comment-568</guid>
		<description>[...] A new player is NewsBasis, the focus of a New York Times story earlier this week.  NewsBasis aims to match journalists with their sources (such as PR firms, businesses and other contacts) online .  A thorough description of the site can be found on ReadWrite Web.  NewsBasis is not the first company to delve into the concept of using technology to improve reporter-source relationships. One of the better-known sites is Help a Reporter Out, known by the acronym HARO, which will become part of PR software firm Vocus. Another site is  ProfNet, part of PRNewswire, which has been around for a long time. One not-so-well-known site is Newsvetter, whose founder wrote a blog post last month about he couldn&#8217;t get anyone to make use of his platform. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A new player is NewsBasis, the focus of a New York Times story earlier this week.  NewsBasis aims to match journalists with their sources (such as PR firms, businesses and other contacts) online .  A thorough description of the site can be found on ReadWrite Web.  NewsBasis is not the first company to delve into the concept of using technology to improve reporter-source relationships. One of the better-known sites is Help a Reporter Out, known by the acronym HARO, which will become part of PR software firm Vocus. Another site is  ProfNet, part of PRNewswire, which has been around for a long time. One not-so-well-known site is Newsvetter, whose founder wrote a blog post last month about he couldn&#8217;t get anyone to make use of his platform. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.newsvetter.com/2010/07/13/how-laziness-killed-my-pr-pitching-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-560</link>
		<dc:creator>James Daily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 04:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsvetter.com/?p=3022#comment-560</guid>
		<description>You bring up the classic journalist dilemma (and as a former newspaper reporter and editor, I can vouch personally for this): Reporters need story ideas all the time, but hate being pitched. I don&#039;t know if it&#039;s some hidden desire to &quot;uncover&quot; a good story or reporters feel &quot;icky&quot; getting a pitch, like we&#039;re accepting an ad or something. Or, it&#039;s just good old laziness, which can even describe amazingly hard-working reporters who put in ridiculous hours.

Good luck with your projects. I enjoy your blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You bring up the classic journalist dilemma (and as a former newspaper reporter and editor, I can vouch personally for this): Reporters need story ideas all the time, but hate being pitched. I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s some hidden desire to &#8220;uncover&#8221; a good story or reporters feel &#8220;icky&#8221; getting a pitch, like we&#8217;re accepting an ad or something. Or, it&#8217;s just good old laziness, which can even describe amazingly hard-working reporters who put in ridiculous hours.</p>
<p>Good luck with your projects. I enjoy your blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric D. Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.newsvetter.com/2010/07/13/how-laziness-killed-my-pr-pitching-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-557</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric D. Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 13:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsvetter.com/?p=3022#comment-557</guid>
		<description>Hi Anderw - 

Newsvetter sounds like an interesting idea.  The problem you&#039;ve run across is the same one I see on the knowledge management (KM) system front...how do you entice people to use a system that is useful but would change their workflow.

My research on the KM front follows something similar to what Brian says above. Find ways to make these systems seamless and make the &#039;switching costs&#039; (as Chris Brogran puts it) as close to zero as possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Anderw &#8211; </p>
<p>Newsvetter sounds like an interesting idea.  The problem you&#8217;ve run across is the same one I see on the knowledge management (KM) system front&#8230;how do you entice people to use a system that is useful but would change their workflow.</p>
<p>My research on the KM front follows something similar to what Brian says above. Find ways to make these systems seamless and make the &#8217;switching costs&#8217; (as Chris Brogran puts it) as close to zero as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: We Won’t Come</title>
		<link>http://www.newsvetter.com/2010/07/13/how-laziness-killed-my-pr-pitching-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-555</link>
		<dc:creator>We Won’t Come</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 08:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsvetter.com/?p=3022#comment-555</guid>
		<description>[...] was just reading about my friend Andrew&#8217;s business, Newsvetter. More specifically, I was reading about how he built it to be the best possible opt-in source for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was just reading about my friend Andrew&#8217;s business, Newsvetter. More specifically, I was reading about how he built it to be the best possible opt-in source for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Spinks</title>
		<link>http://www.newsvetter.com/2010/07/13/how-laziness-killed-my-pr-pitching-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-536</link>
		<dc:creator>David Spinks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsvetter.com/?p=3022#comment-536</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing your experience Andrew.  It&#039;ll help others who try to solve this problem learn, and adapt.  

Brian, you&#039;re exactly right.  The issue is that to understand how an individual blogger would like to be pitched, you have to hear it from them.  Other information about the blogger can be provided however.

Corey:  The short cuts are okay as long as it&#039;s in the research process.  Tools can be created to help PR pros find the most relevant influencers, in less time.  In actually building a relationship, and connecting with a blogger, you cannot take shortcuts.

David, Scribnia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing your experience Andrew.  It&#8217;ll help others who try to solve this problem learn, and adapt.  </p>
<p>Brian, you&#8217;re exactly right.  The issue is that to understand how an individual blogger would like to be pitched, you have to hear it from them.  Other information about the blogger can be provided however.</p>
<p>Corey:  The short cuts are okay as long as it&#8217;s in the research process.  Tools can be created to help PR pros find the most relevant influencers, in less time.  In actually building a relationship, and connecting with a blogger, you cannot take shortcuts.</p>
<p>David, Scribnia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Grice</title>
		<link>http://www.newsvetter.com/2010/07/13/how-laziness-killed-my-pr-pitching-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-523</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Grice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 01:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsvetter.com/?p=3022#comment-523</guid>
		<description>Andrew, you were on the forefront here. The general concept of Newsvetter and, um, HIRPS is great. Give journalists more relevant leads to help place client news in print.

But the traditional journalists don&#039;t want to bother. They think they have the power and so you should come to them. Then, the concept of who is a journalist has evolved, so now you have thousands of people -- bloggers and all the rest -- to try to organize. On the PR side, they are billing by the hour and trying to keep three clients happy so they want to move fast -- too fast to really connect with media.

I think what will happen is there will be a technological solution, a marriage of coverage and media tracking services like Cision with the social media listening/monitoring tools of Radian6 and Visible Technologies. Some algorithm will soon be able to assess the recent coverage of journalists and postings of company news and PR pitches and automatically connect the two based on certain settings and preferences. It sounds like futuristic artificial intellegence, but it&#039;s almost already here with the tools we have for monitoring coverage and sentiment scoring.

If you also apply some human oversight with a crowdsourced Wiki model or the About.com/eHow approach, then you can make it that much more relevant.

I expect some deep pocketed corporation will make this happen by acquiring these services, or some large agency is probably already attempting to build something similar.

Of course, nothing will replace a long-term trusted relationship with a reporter or the chance to share a hands-on demo. In a race for shortcuts, the PR industry sometimes forgets the value of face to face or creating real experiences. Don&#039;t be lazy, people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew, you were on the forefront here. The general concept of Newsvetter and, um, HIRPS is great. Give journalists more relevant leads to help place client news in print.</p>
<p>But the traditional journalists don&#8217;t want to bother. They think they have the power and so you should come to them. Then, the concept of who is a journalist has evolved, so now you have thousands of people &#8212; bloggers and all the rest &#8212; to try to organize. On the PR side, they are billing by the hour and trying to keep three clients happy so they want to move fast &#8212; too fast to really connect with media.</p>
<p>I think what will happen is there will be a technological solution, a marriage of coverage and media tracking services like Cision with the social media listening/monitoring tools of Radian6 and Visible Technologies. Some algorithm will soon be able to assess the recent coverage of journalists and postings of company news and PR pitches and automatically connect the two based on certain settings and preferences. It sounds like futuristic artificial intellegence, but it&#8217;s almost already here with the tools we have for monitoring coverage and sentiment scoring.</p>
<p>If you also apply some human oversight with a crowdsourced Wiki model or the About.com/eHow approach, then you can make it that much more relevant.</p>
<p>I expect some deep pocketed corporation will make this happen by acquiring these services, or some large agency is probably already attempting to build something similar.</p>
<p>Of course, nothing will replace a long-term trusted relationship with a reporter or the chance to share a hands-on demo. In a race for shortcuts, the PR industry sometimes forgets the value of face to face or creating real experiences. Don&#8217;t be lazy, people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Bernoff</title>
		<link>http://www.newsvetter.com/2010/07/13/how-laziness-killed-my-pr-pitching-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-522</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Bernoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsvetter.com/?p=3022#comment-522</guid>
		<description>Interesting to hear about your experience. I am hoping that the participation of somebody like Cision or Vocus would give this a head start. Looking at Brian&#039;s comment, they could easily do what he suggests. Maybe we&#039;re on to something!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to hear about your experience. I am hoping that the participation of somebody like Cision or Vocus would give this a head start. Looking at Brian&#8217;s comment, they could easily do what he suggests. Maybe we&#8217;re on to something!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Geller</title>
		<link>http://www.newsvetter.com/2010/07/13/how-laziness-killed-my-pr-pitching-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-521</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Geller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsvetter.com/?p=3022#comment-521</guid>
		<description>Interesting idea, really unfortunate acronym.  Sounds like it might be a kluge.  What is needed IMO is something light, loosely coupled and crowdsourced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting idea, really unfortunate acronym.  Sounds like it might be a kluge.  What is needed IMO is something light, loosely coupled and crowdsourced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.newsvetter.com/2010/07/13/how-laziness-killed-my-pr-pitching-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-520</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsvetter.com/?p=3022#comment-520</guid>
		<description>If there was a way to pre-populate the journalist and blogger profiles and leave the actual people to only edit if they see something inaccurate, half the battle is won.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there was a way to pre-populate the journalist and blogger profiles and leave the actual people to only edit if they see something inaccurate, half the battle is won.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren Heishman</title>
		<link>http://www.newsvetter.com/2010/07/13/how-laziness-killed-my-pr-pitching-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-519</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren Heishman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 11:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsvetter.com/?p=3022#comment-519</guid>
		<description>Our teams of interns spend many, many minutes researching and preparing high quality pitches that they then deliver -- often to reporters&#039; voicemail boxes to great levels of success. And as the most dynamically strategic and digital agency in the world, why would we consider changing a strategy that continues to work?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our teams of interns spend many, many minutes researching and preparing high quality pitches that they then deliver &#8212; often to reporters&#8217; voicemail boxes to great levels of success. And as the most dynamically strategic and digital agency in the world, why would we consider changing a strategy that continues to work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

